AbstractObjectivesThrough this study, it would be expected to compare the characteristics of medicinal and acupuncture treatment.
MethodOntology DB of traditional Korean medicine has been used comparing medicinal and acupuncture treatment. Terms of the efficacy and the method of treatment were divided to predicate and object. And two groups were compared through contrasting the frequency of occurrence of significant words.
ResultsPredicates utilized more in medicinal treatment are the character ryeom[斂], go[固], pa[破], nae[內], and tu [透]. Predicates utilized more in acupuncture treatment are the character so[疏], jo[調], and seo[舒]. Object utilized more in acupuncture treatment is the character gi[氣]. Object utilized more in medicinal treatment is the character jeong[精].
ConclusionsIn terms about the efficacy of acupuncture, there are many expressions associated with Qi[氣]. But expressions associated with Jing[精] are rare compare to medicinal treatment. There is a difference in language that represents the efficacy between medicinal and acupuncture treatment. In addition, there are some terms about efficacy that are not shared with each other due to the differences in disease treatment and the different branches of the two theories.
참고문헌1. Professors of formula study of Korean Medicine School. Formula Study. Seoul. Yeong-lim Press;(2008). p. 32
2. Huang LX. Outline of Chinese Acupuncture Academic History. ParkHKYoonJHKimKW. Seoul. Beobin Publishers;(2005). p. 853
3. Huang LX. Outline of Chinese Acupuncture Academic History. ParkHKYoonJHKimKW. Seoul. Beobin Publishers;(2005). p. 519
4. Huang LX. Outline of Chinese Acupuncture Academic History. ParkHKYoonJHKimKW. Seoul. Beobin Publishers;(2005). p. 884-900.
5. Li, YF, & Zhuang, LX. On the differences of the natures of acupoints and chinese herbal medicines. World Journal of Acupuncture -Moxibustion, (2007). 7(1), 41.
6. Ling, ZY. Study on the theory of acupoint functions. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion, (2005). 25(2), 131-2.
7. Jang, HC, Kim, JH, Kim, SK, Kim, C, Bae, SH, & Kim, AN, et al. Ontology for medicinal materials based on traditional Korean medicine. Bioinformatics, (2010). 26(18), 2359-60.
8. Kim, SK, Jang, HC, Kim, JH, Yea, SJ, Kim, C, & Eum, DM, et al. A Study on Reasoning based on Herb and Formula Ontologies. J Korean Medical Classics, (2009). 22(3), 97-105.
9. Kim, AN, Oh, YT, Kim, SK, Seo, JS, & Jang, HC. Disassembling Indication Terms of Medicinal Treatment Using a Cooperation Tool. Korean J Oriental Physiology & Pathology, (2013). 27(4), 362-6.
10. Oh, YT, Lee, BW, & Kim, EH. A Study of the virtue terms in herbal medicine. J Korean Medical Classics, (2010). 23(5), 35-50.
11. Oh, YT, Jeon, BU, Jang, HC, Kim, CS, Kim, JH, & Kim, SK, et al. Study of connections between efficacy terms and remedy terms by conversion the raw terms into the representative terms. J Korean Medical Classics, (2011). 24(5), 99-105.
12. Hong WS. Jeonggyohwangjenaegyeong-yeongchu. Seoul. Institute of Oriental Medicine;(1985). p. 51
13. Jun Heo. New parallel translation texts of Donguibogam(annotated by Jin JP). Seoul. Beobin Publishers;(2012). p. 2061
14. Li, YF, & Zhuang, LX. On the differences of the natures of acupoints and chinese herbal medicines. World J Acu-Moxi, (2007). 7(1), 41.
15. Ling, ZY. Study on the theory of acupoint functions. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion, (2005). 25(2), 131-2.
16. Zeng, XF. Change of status of the efficacy in herbal medicine by time period. Hubei J TCM, (2008). 30(5), 28.
17. Yong, XJ, Jiang, YG, Chen, Y, & Han, PY. Discuss the historical evolution of the expression for prescription efficiency and it’s modern research meaning. Lishizhen Medicine and Materia Medica Research, (2005). 16(4), 293-4.
18. Li, YF, & Zhuang, LX. On the differences of the natures of acupoints and chinese herbal medicines. World J Acu-Moxi, (2007). 7(1), 41.
19. Huang LX. Outline of Chinese Acupuncture Academic History. ParkHKYoonJHKimKW. Seoul. Beobin Publishers;(2005). p. 931-8.
|
|