AbstractObjectivesThis study was aimed to present the experts’ opinions for the successful application of Korean traditional medical practices (KTMPs) to the International Classification of Health Intervention (ICHI).
MethodsTwo doctors of Korean Medicine and two health information managers who had tried coding 131 KTMPs using ICHI participated in the focus group discussion. The remarks from the discussion were summarized according to the thematic analysis method.
ResultsThe participants expected ICHI to be mainly used for statistics when applied to TKMPs. It can be used for payment systems as well, but it was expected that additional work would be required. They thought the current version of the ICHI did not sufficiently reflect the KMTPs of the real world, and even the interventions already included in the ICHI were not explained enough in the system. They thought it would not be easy to explain more KTMPs within the current structure of the ICHI, but they also said it seemed possible. In the process, rather than adding entirely new stem codes, it would be better to generate new combinations of the existing codes, to suppose subdivided codes, and to utilize the include terms or extension codes.
ConclusionsFor the successful introduction of ICHI, clarifying the definition of each intervention of KTMPs is a top priority. In addition, it is necessary to continue the matching work of ICHI - KMPTs and also required to make this effort together with the field of traditional medicine and complementary medicine worldwide.
참고문헌1. Madden R, Sykes C, Ustun TB. World Health Organization family of international classifications: definition, scope and purpose. Geneva. World Health Organization;(2007.
2. SSiS. WHO-FIC Introduction. [cited 2020 July 21]; Available from: https://www.hins.or.kr/sco/WhoPicIntro.do
3. Korea S. Statistical Classification Portal: Health Classifications. [cited 2020 July 21]; Available from: http://kssc.kostat.go.kr/ksscNew_web/kssc/main/main.do?gubun=1&pageChk=Y#
4. MITEL. ICHI Beta-3 Reference Guide. International Classification of Health Interventions. 2020. [cited 2020 July 21]; Available from: https://mitel.dimi.uniud.it/ichi/docs/ICHI%20Beta-3%20Reference%20Guide.pdf
5. MITEL. ICHI Beta-3 Web Browser. 2020. Available from: https://mitel.dimi.uniud.it/ichi/
6. Fortune N, Madden R, & Almborg A-H. Use of a new international classification of health interventions for capturing information on health interventions relevant to people with disabilities. International journal of environmental research and public health;(2018). 15(1):145
7. Deng H, Adams CE, Shokraneh F, & Liang S. Classification of interventions in traditional Chinese medicine. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine;(2018). 38(2):315-20.
8. Han C-h, Kim M, Jang I, Min S, Jo N, Shin D. Using ICHI beta 2018 to code TM interventions. In : WHO-FIC Network Annual Meetign 2018; 2018; Seoul, Korea: WHO/CTS.
9. AKOM. Development of Korean Classification of Medical Interventions and Relative Value Compatible to International Classification (Korean Medicine). 2013. [cited 2020 July 21]; Available from: http://repository.hira.or.kr/handle/2019.oak/1582
10. AKOM. Standadization of Classification System for Non-Benefit Interventions and Development of Definitions for Interventions (Korean Medicine). 2013. [cited 2020 July 21]; Available from: http://repository.hira.or.kr/handle/2019.oak/1587
11. SKOM. Korean Standard Korean Medical Intervention Classification Improvement. 201 [cited 2020 July 21]; Available from: http://repository.hira.or.kr/handle/2019.oak/732
12. KMRA. Study on Development of ICHI-KM, year 3. 2019. [cited 2020 July 21]; Available from: http://www.prism.go.kr/homepage/theme/retrieveThemeDetail.do;jsessionid=EDCF7834731489AB6A6B21F87578341A.node02?cond_research_name=&cond_organ_id=&cond_research_year_start=&cond_research_year_end=&cond_brm_super_id=NB000120061201100006252&research_id=1240000-201900007&pageIndex=28&leftMenuLevel=110
|
|