A Pilot Study on the Association between Iris parameters and 8 Constitutional Medicine: Retrospective Chart Review

Article information

J Korean Med. 2018;39(2):56-63
Publication date (electronic) : 2018 June 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.13048/jkm.18015
1Department of Human Informatics of Korean Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung-Hee University
2School of Management, Kyung-Hee University
3Department of Biofunctional Medicine and Diagnostics, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyung-Hee University
Correspondence to: 박영재(Young-Jae Park), Department of Human Informatics of Korean Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung-Hee University, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Korea, Tel: +82-2-440-7229, Fax: +82-2-440-7242, E-mail: omdyj@hanmail.net
Received 2018 May 14; Revised 2018 May 31; Accepted 2018 June 14.

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to investigate the usefulness of some iris parameters in predicting the 8 constitution

Methods

From November 2012 to February 2018, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 171 patients who were visited to the Korean Oriental Clinic. We conducted a stepwise binary logistic regression analysis to find the association between Iris parameters and 8 constitutional Medicine.

Results

Automic Nerve Wreath Ration (ANWR) was larger and toxic radii was longer in Earth and Wood constitutions than Metal and water constitution. ANWR was larger and pupil are ratio(PAR) was smaller in Wood constitutions than Earth constitutions. And others did not show significant results.

Conclusions

This study suggests that the relationship between some of the iris parameters and 8 constitution was significant, but more accurate follow-up study is needed.

Fig. 1

Flow chart of retrospective chart review for the iris parameters and the relationships between iris parameters and Eight Constitution Medicine Type. ANWAR: autonomic nerve wreath area ratio, PAR: pupil area ratio.

Fig. 2

Video iriscope

Fig. 3

Definitions of ANWAR and PAR. ANWAR: autonomic nerve wreath area ratio, PAR: pupil area ratio. “A” indicates the length of the Autonomic Nerve Wreath(ANW). “B” indicates the length of the iris, including the ANW. “C” indicates the total length of the eye, consisting of the iris and pupil. “D” indicates the length of the pupil. In this study, ANWAR was defined as π/π, and PAR was defined as π/π,

Fig. 4

Five iridological markers used in grading or calculating the six iris parameters. A: lacunae, B: pigment dot, C: nerve rings, D: Autonomic Nerve Wreath(ANW), E: toxic radii.

Fig. 5

The blood vessels of the iris

Comparison of Demographic Characteristics According to CS and HS

Binary Logistic Regression of Iris and 8 constitution

Model summary. R square.

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

References

1. Baek IS. Iridology by photograph Seoul: Seowondang; 1998. p. 8–9.
2. Lee JM. Dongeuisoosebowon Seoul: Daeseongmunhwasa; 1998. p. 5–59.
3. Kuon DW. A study of constitution-Acupuncture. Journal of the International Congress of Acupuncture & Moxibuston Tokyo: Japan Acupuncture & Moxibustion Society; 1965. 10p. 149–167.
4. Kuon DW. A study of constitution-Acupuncture. The Society of Korean Medicine 1965;16:25–28.
5. Kuon DW. A study of constitution-Acupuncture. Journal of Myongji Univ 1974;7:607–625.
6. Kuon DW. Know your 8 constitution. Bitgwasogeum Seoul: Duranno. 194(8)p. 116–118.
7. Ernst E. Iridology: A Systematic Review. dissertation UK: University of Exeter; 1999.
8. Lim YW, Park SI, Park YJ, Park YB. A Review of Iridology. The Journal of the Society of Korean Medicine Diagnostics 2013;17(1):1–16.
9. Lim YW, Park YJ, Park YB. A longitudinal study of iris parameters and their relationships with temperament characteristics. European Journal of Intergrative Medicine 2016;8(6):991–1000.
10. Hwang WJ. A Comparative Study of Sasang Constitution and Iris Constitutional Diagnosis. The Journal of traditional Korean medicin 2000;10:221–229.
11. Lim YW, Park YJ, Park YB. Experimental study of reliable iris parameters and their relationships with temperament, character, and heart rate variability. Europian Journal of Intergrative Medicine 2014;6(5):516–23.
12. Lee JH, Kim MY, Kim HJ, Shin YS, Oh HS, Park YB, et al. A Study on Stage Classification of Eight Constitution Questionnaire. The journal of the Korea institute of oriental medical diagnostics 2012;16(2):59–70.
13. Lee HS, Lee YB, Shin YS, Kim HJ, Seo JC, Lee JM, et al. A Pilot Study on Reliability of Pulse Diagnosis in Eight-Constitution Medicine. The Korean Journal of Meridian & Acupoint 2005;22:1–8.
14. Shin YS, Park Yst Park YJ, Kim MY, Lee SC, Oh HS. A study for 8 Constitution Medicine Diagnosis Expert System Development. The Journal Of The Korea Institute Of Oriental Medical Diagnostics 2008;12(1):93–154.
15. Jang BR. Neuro-ophthalmology 2nd editionth ed. Seoul: Iljogak; 2011. p. 167–170.
16. Lee Jh, Lee HB, Heo W, Hong YJ. Ophthalology 9th editionth ed. Seoul: Iljogak; 2013. p. 26–27.
17. Donald Dr, Bamer R. Practical iridology and sclerology 1996;:83.
18. Park SI. Iris Image Analysis Method for Classifying an Iris Image Into Four Types. Korean Intellectual Property Office 2009;June. 5.
19. O’Brian BS. Iridology Textbook 1stth ed. USA: Createspace Independent Pub; 2015. p. 29–35.
20. Jang ES, Kim HS, Jung JW, Yoo JH, Lim JG, Lee SW. The Pilot Study on the Association of Diagnosis Resultsbetween Sasang Constitutional Medicine and Eight Constitutional Medicine. Korean Journal of Oriental Medicine 2008;14(2):97–98.
21. Jo BK, Bae JI, Masao ST. Experimental Study of Acid-Base Balance and Variations of Heart Rate, Fluid and Electrolyte by Electrical Stimulation according to the Physical Constitution. Korean Journal of Oriental Medicine 1993;14(2):349–354.
22. Kwak CK, Sohn EH, Lee EJ, Koh BH, Song IB, Hwang W. A Study about Sasang Constitutional difference on Autonomous Function after Acupuncture stimulation. Journal of Sasang Constitutional Medicine 2004;16(3):76–84.
23. Park SI. Principles of iris medicine and basics of iris diagnosis 1stth ed. Daejon: The Korean Iridology and Medical Association; 2012. p. 29–31.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

Flow chart of retrospective chart review for the iris parameters and the relationships between iris parameters and Eight Constitution Medicine Type. ANWAR: autonomic nerve wreath area ratio, PAR: pupil area ratio.

Fig. 2

Video iriscope

Fig. 3

Definitions of ANWAR and PAR. ANWAR: autonomic nerve wreath area ratio, PAR: pupil area ratio. “A” indicates the length of the Autonomic Nerve Wreath(ANW). “B” indicates the length of the iris, including the ANW. “C” indicates the total length of the eye, consisting of the iris and pupil. “D” indicates the length of the pupil. In this study, ANWAR was defined as π/π, and PAR was defined as π/π,

Fig. 4

Five iridological markers used in grading or calculating the six iris parameters. A: lacunae, B: pigment dot, C: nerve rings, D: Autonomic Nerve Wreath(ANW), E: toxic radii.

Fig. 5

The blood vessels of the iris

Table 1

Comparison of Demographic Characteristics According to CS and HS

scale Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4
Iris Density Absence of lacuna 1–3 lacunas 4–6 lacunas More than seven lacunas
Pigment Absence of pigment One pigment More than two pigments
Nerve Ring Circular arc of the nerve ring less than one-fourth the circular arc of the outer iris circumference Circular arc of the nerve ring ranging from one-fourth to four-fifths the circular arc of the outer iris circumference Length of the Circular arc of the nerve ring more than four-fifths the circular arc of the outer iris circumference
Toxic Radii Length of the toxic radii less than one-fifth the of the total radius of the eye Length of the toxic radii ranging from one-fifth to one-third the length of the total radius of the eye Length of the toxic radii ranging more than one-third the length of the total radius of the eye

Among the four iris parameters, pigment, nerve ring, and toxic radii were graded on a three-point scale, and iris density was graded on a four-point scale

Table 2

Binary Logistic Regression of Iris and 8 constitution

step B S.E, Wals Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I. for EXP(B)

Lower Upper
1st analysis ANWR(ratio) 6.944 2.163 10.310 .001 1036.767 14.958 71861.469
Toxic radii(grade) .607 .228 7.101 .008 1.835 1.174 2.869
Constant −2.170 .591 13.466 .000 .114

2nd analysis Lacunae(grade) −.370 .205 3.272 .070 .690 .462 1.031
Toxic radii(grade) .820 .459 3.189 .074 2.270 .923 5.584
Constant −.001 .790 .000 .999 .999

3rd analysis ANWR(ratio) 13.528 4.141 10.674 .001 750503.544 224.259 2.512E9
PAR(ratio) −17.961 9.957 3.254 .071 .000 .000 4.730
Constant −1.035 1.188 .759 .384 .355

SE:standard error, ANWR:autonomic nerve wreath ratio, PAR:pupil area ratio

***

p<0.001,

**

p<0.01

Table 3

Model summary. R square.

step −2 Log likelihood Cox & Snell R square Nagelkerke R square
1 217.289a .102 .136
2 108.966a .085 .114
3 95.926a .217 .292

Table 4

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

step Chi-square df Sig.
1 7.440 8 .490
2 7.052 4 .133
3 12.138 8 .145