Epidemiological Characteristics of COVID-19 in Chungju City from 2021 July to 2021 December

Article information

J Korean Med. 2023;44(3):47-58
Publication date (electronic) : 2023 September 1
doi : https://doi.org/10.13048/jkm.23030
1Division of Infectious Disease Control, Chungju Public Healthcenter
2Research Center of Traditional Korean Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Wonkwang University
3Hanbang Cardio-Renal Syndrome Research Center, School of Korean Medicine, Wonkwang University
Correspondence to: Jungtae Leem, Research Center of Traditional Korean Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Wonkwang University, 460, Iksan-daero, Iksan-si, Jeollabuk-do, 54538, Republic of Korea, E-mail: julcho@naver.com
Received 2023 June 29; Revised 2023 July 13; Accepted 2023 August 17.

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate the epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19 in Chungju City from July to December 2021.

Methods

The authors processed and analyzed the epidemiological analysis report written by researcher. The estimated reproduction rate was analyzed using web-based software that calculates time-varying reproduction numbers. The results were analyzed through univariate multiple regression analysis, with a maximum significance level set at 0.05.

Results

During the study period, a total of 1,188 patients were identified, with 7.9% of them progressing to a severe status. The maximum reproduction rate recorded was 3.48. Factors associated with the transition to a severe status included the presence of symptoms at the time of diagnosis, lack of vaccination, and belonging to the age group over 40.

Conclusion

Based on the findings of this study, it can be strongly supported that the measures implemented in Chungju City, such as social distancing, vaccination, and preemptive diagnostic tests, were appropriate. Furthermore, it demonstrates that Chungju City effectively managed the impact of COVID-19. Korean Medicine Doctors made significant contributions to the epidemiological investigations of COVID-19. To comprehensively manage infectious diseases, it is crucial to provide administrative and legal support and encourage active research to expand the role of Korean Medicine Doctors in this area.

Fig. 1

Number of COVID-19 patients and estimated reproductive number of COVID-19 in Chungju City

Numbers of COVID-19 Patients by Monthly from 2021 July to 2021 December

Demographic Characteristic of COVID-19 Patients in Chungju City from 2021 July to 2021 December

Characteristics of Patients with Disease Progression

Association between disease progression and prognostic factor of COVID-19 via Multiple Linear Regression Analysis

Proportion of Population and COVID-19 Patient

References

1. Hu B, Guo H, Zhou P, Shi ZL. Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Nat Rev Microbiol 2021;19(3):141–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-020-00459-7 .
2. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jun 5]. Occurrence Status Available from: https://ncv.kdca.go.kr/covdash/biz/dsbd/covDsbdOcrn.do .
3. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Guidelines for COVID-19 Response for Local Governments 13th Editionth ed.
4. An S, Gwak J, Kwon S, Baek S, Bae H, Kwon GY, et al. Relationship between RT-PCR Ct Values and Epidemiological and Clinical Characteristics of COVID-19 in Sejong City. Public Health Wkly Rep 2021;14(31):2229–35.
5. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. 2020–2021 Infectious Disease Epidemiological Investigation Report
6. Lipsitch M, Cohen T, Cooper B, Robins JM, Ma S, James L, et al. Transmission dynamics and control of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Science 2003;300(5627):1966–70.
7. Chen T, Dai Z, Mo P, Li X, Ma Z, Song S, et al. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Older Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China: A Single-Centered, Retrospective Study. The Journals of Gerontology 2020;Sep. 1. 75(9):1788–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaa089 .
8. Jeon CH, Leem JT, Chi GY, Choi GM, Kim HJ. Effect of Non-contact Korean Medical Treatment for Patients Recovering at Home with Positive Coronavirus Disease 2019 Diagnostic Test Results at a Local Public Health Center. Journal of Physiology & Pathology in Korean Medicine 2022;36(4):130–7.
9. Kang B, Chu H, Youn BY, Leem J. Prevention and management of adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination using traditional Korean medicine: An online survey of public health doctors. World J Clin Cases 2022;10(28):10053.
10. Cori A, Ferguson NM, Fraser C, Cauchemez S. A New Framework and Software to Estimate Time-Varying Reproduction Numbers During Epidemics. Am J Epidemiol 2013;Nov. 1. 178(9):1505–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwt133 .
11. Stoltzfus JC. Logistic Regression: A Brief Primer. Academic Emergency Medicine 2011;Oct. 1. 18(10):1099–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01185.x .
12. Jang J, Park SY, Ahn SH, Yang S, Kim SS, Park SB. One-year report of COVID-19 outbreak in the Republic of Korea, January-December 2021. Public Health Wkly Rep 2022;15(15):231–4.
13. Gyeonggi Province Infectious Disease Control Support Team Issue Report. COVID-19 infection status and characteristics among foreign residents in Gyeonggi Province in 2021 2022;
14. Torok M, Nelson A, Alexander L, Mejia GC, MacDonald PD. Epidemic curves ahead. Focus on Field Epidemiology 2003;1(5):1–6.
15. Lim JS, Cho SI, Ryu S, Pak SI. Interpretation of the Basic and Effective Reproduction Number. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 2020;Nov. 30. 53(6):405–8.
16. Jang JG, Hur J, Choi EY, Hong KS, Lee W, Ahn JH. Prognostic Factors for Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Daegu, Korea. Journal of Korea Medicine Science 2020;Jun. 2. 35(23):e209-0. http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e209 .
17. Dorjee K, Kim H, Bonomo E, Dolma R. Prevalence and predictors of death and severe disease in patients hospitalized due to COVID-19: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of 77 studies and 38,000 patients. PLoS One 2020;Dec. 7. 15(12):e0243191. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243191 .
18. Park HC, Kim DH, Cho A, Kim J, Yun K, sang Kim J, et al. Clinical outcomes of initially asymptomatic patients with COVID-19: a Korean nationwide cohort study. Ann Med 2021;Jan. 1. 53(1):357–64.
19. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. COVID-19 Vaccination Q&A Fact Sheet. Are COVID-19 vaccinations effective? [Internet] [cited 2023 Jun 5]. Available from: https://ncv.kdca.go.kr/filepath/boardDownload.es?bid=ATT&list_no=679&seq=1 .
20. Kang B, Chu H, Youn BY, Leem J. Prevention and management of adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination using traditional Korean medicine: An online survey of public health doctors. World J Clin Cases 2022;Oct. 6. 10(28):10053–65.
21. The Association of Korean Medicine. 2020 Korean Medicine COVID-19 White Paper
22. Akomnews. Korean Medicine Doctor’s COVID-19 Antigen Test: “Not a Violation of Medical Law.” 2023. Apr. 11. [cited 2023 Jun 5]; Available from: https://www.akomnews.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=news&wr_id=52883 .
23. Kim J, Chun H, Lee H, Leem J. The Role and Policy of Korean Medicine Doctor for the Prevention and Management of Infectious Diseases: A Mixed-Methods Approach. Journal of Korean Medicine 2023;44(2):45–59.
24. Li M, Zhu H, Liu Y, Lu Y, Sun M, Zhang Y, et al. Role of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Treating Severe or Critical COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies. Front Pharmacol 2022;13:926189.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

Number of COVID-19 patients and estimated reproductive number of COVID-19 in Chungju City

Table 1

Numbers of COVID-19 Patients by Monthly from 2021 July to 2021 December

Month 2021.07 2021.08 2021.09 2021.10 2021.11 2021.12 Total
Number of Patients 95 327 117 164 104 381 1188
Number of Deaths* 0 3 2 1 0 1 8
*

Excepted 2 cases are counted at 2022 January.

Table 2

Demographic Characteristic of COVID-19 Patients in Chungju City from 2021 July to 2021 December

(N=1188)
Parameter Number Percentage (%)
Age Group (years)
 0–9 128 10.8
 10–19 171 14.4
 20–29 142 12.0
 30–39 157 13.2
 40–49 173 14.6
 50–59 156 13.1
 60–69 166 14.0
 70–79 77 6.5
 80–89 15 1.3
 90–99 3 0.2

Gender
 Male 649 54.6
 Female 539 45.4

Nationality
 Domestic 1045 88.0
 Foreign 143 12.0

Progress
 Mild 1094 92.1
 Recovery after transfer 84 7.1
 Death after transfer 10 0.8

Underlying disease
 No 886 74.6
 Yes 302 25.4
  Hypertension 165 13.9
  Diabetes 85 7.2
  Dyslipidemia 67 5.6
  Cardiovascular disease 28 2.4

Vaccination
 No 502 42.3
 Yes 686 57.7

Table 3

Characteristics of Patients with Disease Progression

Parameter Number of COVID-19 patients in Chungju (N=1188) Number of patients recovered after transfer (N=84) (%) Number of patients who died after transfer (N=10) (%)
Age Group (years)
 <30 441 8 (1.8) 0 (0.0)
 30–39 157 11 (7.0) 0 (0.0)
 40–49 173 17 (9.8) 0 (0.0)
 50–59 156 26 (16.7) 2 (1.3)
 60–69 166 10 (6.0) 4 (2.4)
 70–79 77 11 (14.3) 3 (3.9)
 80–89 15 1 (6.7) 0 (0.0)
 90–99 3 0 (0.0) 1 (33.3)

Gender
 Male 649 44 (6.8) 7 (1.1)
 Female 539 40 (7.4) 3 (0.6)

Underlying diseases
 No 886 51 (5.8) 5 (0.6)
 Yes 302 33 (10.1) 5 (1.7)

Vaccination
 No 502 55 (11.0) 5 (1.0)
 Yes 686 29 (4.2) 5 (0.7)

Table 4

Association between disease progression and prognostic factor of COVID-19 via Multiple Linear Regression Analysis

Parameters OR1 95% CI2 p-value
Gender 1.19 0.76–1.88 0.4
Nationality 1.96 0.85–5.36 0.15
Symptoms at the time of diagnosis 2.09 1.18–3.94 0.016*
Hypertension 1.39 0.74–2.55 0.3
Diabetes 1.30 0.61–2.59 0.5
Dyslipidemia 0.78 0.30–1.84 0.6
Cardiovascular disease 1.65 0.51–4.51 0.4
No Vaccination 3.45 2.04–5.88 <0.001

Age Group (years)
 0–9 0.00 0.00–79.0 >0.9
 10–19 0.54 0.12–2.39 0.4
 (Reference: 20–29) - - -
 30–39 2.95 0.97–11.0 0.072
 40–49 3.96 1.39–14.3 0.018*
 50–59 7.54 2.75–26.7 <0.001
 60–69 4.55 1.44–17.6 0.015*
 70< 10.4 3.22–41.2 <0.001
1

OR: Odds Ratio;

2

CI: Confidence Interval,

*

p<0.05;

p<0.001

Table 5

Proportion of Population and COVID-19 Patient

Nationwide Chungju City

Proportion of population (%) Proportion of COVID-19 patient (%) Difference Proportion of population (%) Proportion of COVID-19 patient (%) Difference
Age Group (years)
 <10 7.3 8.9 1.6 6.6 10.8 4.2
 10–19 9.1 10.9 1.8 8.8 14.4 5.6
 20–29 12.9 14.8 1.9 11.3 12.0 0.7
 30–39 13.0 14.7 1.7 10.9 13.2 2.3
 40–49 15.8 14.3 −1.5 14.4 14.6 0.2
 50–59 16.7 13.3 −3.5 17.7 13.1 −4.6
 60–69 13.9 14.1 0.2 16.5 14.0 −2.5
 70–79 7.2 5.9 −1.3 8.2 6.5 −1.7
 80< 4.1 3.1 −1.0 5.8 1.5 −4.3