The Characteristics of the Subject and Relationship between the Intention to Use Hospice and Allowance of Pre-accession based on the Advance Directives Registered by Korean Medicine Clinic

Article information

J Korean Med. 2024;45(3):31-39

Publication date (electronic) : 2024 September 1

doi : https://doi.org/10.13048/jkm.24035

Hae-chang Yoon ¹^,

, Junghyo Cho ²

¹Haechang Korean medicine clinic

²East-West Cancer Center of Daejeon Hospital, Daejeon University

Correspondence to: Hae-chang Yoon, Haechang Korean medicine clinic, 2F, 316, Yonghak-ro, Suseong-gu, Daegu, Republic of Korea, Tel: +82-53-784-7691, Fax: +82-50-4392-9435, Email: yoon5100@naver.com

Received 2024 May 24; Revised 2024 July 18; Accepted 2024 August 19.

Abstract

Background

In the Republic of Korea, the implementation of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision System has facilitated end-of-life care planning through advanced directives. Despite the availability of this system, there are few studies about advance directives itself and Korean medicine clinics(KMC) have been underrepresented as registration institutions, with limited data on their involvement.

Objective

The study delved into the landscape of advance directives within KMC, shedding light on the characteristics of the subject and the correlation between sociodemographic factors with the intention to use hospice and the allowance of pre-access.

Results

Data from a specific KMC's advance directives registry were analyzed, with 89 cases meeting the criteria for investigation. Results revealed a predominant female presence among registrants, with an average age of 70.28 ± 9.47 years. While no statistically significant relationship was found between gender/age/distance and the intention to use hospice or pre-access allowance, those expressing a desire for hospice care were more inclined to permit pre-access. In addition, the closer the distance, the older the subject. These findings underscore the evolving dynamics of end-of-life care planning in Korea, urging greater participation of KMC in hospice palliative care initiatives. The study's limitations include its single-institution focus and potential impact from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusion

The study found a strong link between hospice intention and pre-access allowance and highlighted the association between distance and age. These findings emphasized the evolving role of KMC in end-of-life care planning and call for further research to explore their increasing involvement in hospice palliative care initiatives.

Keywords: Advance directives; Korean medicine; Hospice; Palliative care

Fig. 1

Locations of registration agency and participants

* Double border circle: Korean medicine clinic as registry agency of advanced directives, filled circle: location of each participant

Table 1

Sociodemographic Characteristics and Variables in Advanced Directive of Participants

Table 2

The Relation of Intention to Use Hospice and Allowance of Pre-accession with Sex, Age, and Distance

Table 3

The Relation between Intention to Use Hospice and Allowance of Pre-accession

References

1. Korean Law Information Center. Act on Hospice ad Palliative care and Decisions on Life-sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End of Life [cited 2024 April 19]; Available from: URL:https://www.law.go.kr/lsSc.do?section=&menuId=1&subMenuId=15&tabMenuId=81&eventGubun=060101&query=%EC%97%B0%EB%AA%85%EC%9D%98%EB%A3%8C#undefined.

2. National Agency for Management of Life-sustaining Treatment. Monthly statistics [cited 2024 April 19]; Available from: URL:https://www.lst.go.kr/comm/monthlyStatistics.do.

3. Korean Statistical Information Service. Estimated population by major age groups [cited 2024 April 19]; Available from: URL:https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1BPA003&vw_cd=MT_ZTITLE&list_id=&scrId=&seqNo=&lang_mode=ko&obj_var_id=&itm_id=&conn_path=E1&docId=0268536731&markType=S&itmNm=%EC%A0%84%EA%B5%AD.

4. Korean Statistical Information Service. Survey on the Status of the Elderly [cited 2024 April 19]; Available from: URL:https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=117&tblId=DT_117071_075&vw_cd=MT_ZTITLE&list_id=117_11771_003_04&scrId=&seqNo=&lang_mode=ko&obj_var_id=&itm_id=&conn_path=MT_ZTITLE&path=%252FstatisticsList%252FstatisticsListIndex.do.

5. National Agency for Management of Life-sustaining Treatment. Monthly statistics [cited 2024 July 16]; Available from: URL: https://www.lst.go.kr/addt/composableorgan.do.

6. Kim M.S., Gang M.H., Kim Y.O.. 2018;Completion and related factors of advance directives in old adults. J Korea Contents Assoc 18(2):240–247. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2018.18.02.240.

7. Lim J.M., Kim B.J.. 2021;Intentions of signing advance directives among Koreans aged 65 and older, with policy implications. J Human Soc Sci 12(2):2733–2744. http://doi.org/10.22143/HSS21.12.2.192.

8. Park N.J., Hong S.A., Song I.M.. 2021;Factors affecting intention to complete advance directives in older Koreans. Korean Public Health Res 47(1):47–57. https://doi.org/10.22900/kphr.2021.47.1.005.

9. Park J.K.. 2023;Factors Affecting the Preparation of Advance Directives of Older People. J Korean Soc Integr Med 11(2):87–99. https://doi.org/10.15268/ksim.2023.11.2.087.

10. Yeom E.Y., Seo K.S.. 2019;Influence of older person's ego integrity and knowledge of advance directives on their attitude toward withdrawal from life-sustaining treatment. J Korean Gerontol Nurs 21(3):173–182. https://doi.org/10.17079/jkgn.2019.21.3.173.

11. Cheon J.Y.. 2020;Completion of Advance Directive and Withdrawal of Life-sustaining Treatments among Older Adults in South Korea: A Systematic Review. Korean Soc Living Environmental System 27(4):473–488. http://doi.org/10.21086/ksles.2020.08.27.4.473.

12. Ryu M.H.. 2022;Public knowledge and attitude towards advance directives and their intention towards withdrawing life-sustaining treatment. J Korea Acad-Ind Coop Soc 23(7):297–307. http://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2022.23.7.297.

13. Han H.K., Oh C.S., Ryu J.S., Lim B.M.. 2014. Comparison of Patients’ Satisfactions with General Korean Medicine Clinics and Networked Korean Medicine Clinics in Seoul, Korea. J Soc Prevent Korean Med 18(3)57–67. https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO201403760396372.page.

14. Hwang J.W., Park J.S.. 2015. Analysis of the Use of Oriental Medicine Outpatient Services and the Characteristics of Users. Kor Health Ind Dev Inst Brief 1751–8. https://www.khidi.or.kr/fileDownload?titleId=129478&fileId=1&fileDownType=C&paramMenuId=MENU01783.

15. Lim J.W., Lee K.J.. 2021;Influencing factors of using Korean Medicine services – focusing on the 2017 Korean Medicine Utilization Survey. J Korean Med 42(1):12–25. http://doi.org/10.13048/jkm.21002.

16. Choi S.Y., Shin H.K., Park H.M., Lee S. D.. 2012. A Analysis of Patients Using Korean Medicine Clinics. — Analysis of Outpatients and Inpatients by Age, Sex and Regions —. Kor J Oriental Prevent Med Soc 16(2)67–81. https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO201232736361686.page.

17. Massimo A., Claudia B., Cinzia D.G., Fabio F., Luigi C.. 2015;Distance as a Barrier to Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment: Review of the Literature. The Oncologist 20(12):1378–1385. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0110.

18. Lin C.C., Hill C.E., Kerber K.A., Burke J.F., Skolarus L.E., Esper G.J., de Havenon A., De Lott L.B., Callaghan B.C.. 2023;Patient Travel Distance to Neurologist Visits. Neurology 101(18):e1807–e1820. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000207810.

19. Central Hospice Center. 2023. 2022 National Hospice Palliative Care Annual Report Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare; https://hospice.go.kr:8444/index.html?menuno=22&bbsno=407&boardno=9&ztag=rO0ABXQANzxjYWxsIHR5cGU9ImJvYXJkIiBubz0iOSIgc2tpbj0iaG9zcGljZV9ub3JtYWwiPjwvY2FsbD4%3D&siteno=1&act=view.

20. Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2024. Comprehensive Plan for Life-sustaining Treatment of Hospice (2024~2028) Seoul: Republic of Korea; https://www.mohw.go.kr/boardDownload.es?bid=0008&list_no=1480964&seq=1.

21. Yoon H.C., Son C.G., Lee N.H., Cho J.H.. 2018;Study of the Developmental History on Hospice · Palliative Care and Need for Korean Medicine. Journal of Internal Korean Medicine 39(4):662–675. https://doi.org/10.22246/jikm.2018.39.4.662.

22. Rogers J., Goldsmith C., Sinclair C., Auret K.. 2019;The advance care planning nurse facilitator: describing the role and identifying factors associated with successful implementation. Aust J Prim Health 25(6):564–569. https://doi.org/10.1071/PY19010.

23. Bioethics Policy Research Center. 2011. Report for Suspension of Life-sustaining Treatment and Pre-medical Intentions. Medical Ethics Policy Research Report http://www.nibp.kr/xe/?module=file&act=procFileDownload&file_srl=9294&sid=fa25ade0907ba00d7c9581befe272f69.

24. Heo D.S.. 2009;Patient Autonomy and Advance Directives in Korea. J Korean Med Assoc 52(9):865–870. http://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2009.52.9.865.

25. Song T.J., Kim K.P., Koh Y.. 2008. Factors determining the establishment of DNR orders in oncologic patients at a university hospital in Korea. Korean J Med 74403–410. https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001240891.

26. Shim B.Y., Hong S.I., Park J.M., Cho H.J., Ok J.S., Kim S.Y., Kim H. K.. 2004. DNR Order for Terminal Cancer Patients at Hospice Ward. Korean J Hosp Palliat Care 7232–237. https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO200423514844425.page.

27. Oh D.Y., Kim J.H., Kim D.W., Im S.A., Kim T.Y., Heo D.S., Kim N. K.. 2006;CPR or DNR? End-of-life decision in Korean cancer patients: a single center’s experience. Support Care Cancer 14:103–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-005-0885-5.

28. Hickman R.L. Jr, Daly B.J., Lee E.S.. 2012;Decisional conflict and regret: consequences of surrogate decision making for the chronically critically ill. Appl Nurs Res 25(4):271–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2011.03.003.

29. Chang W.K., Ahn K.J., Kim M.Y., Kim Y.R., Han Y.J.. 2015;The role of a patient’s family when the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment is expected: A narrative analysis. Korean J Med Ethics 18(2):172–189. https://doi.org/10.35301/ksme.2015.18.2.172.

Article information Continued