Development and Monitoring Evaluation of the Clinical Pathway for post-operative care in patients with thyroid cancer in integrative medical center

Article information

J Korean Med. 2025;46(1):15-28
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 March 01
doi : https://doi.org/10.13048/jkm.25002
1Integrative Cancer Center, CHA Ilsan Medical Center, CHA university
2Department of Surgery, CHA Ilsan Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine
Correspondence to: Jee Young Lee, Integrative Cancer Center, Cha Ilsan Medical Center, Jungang-ro 1205, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Rep of Korea, Tel: +82-31-782-3113, F: +82-31-782-3105, E-mail: happiade@chamc.co.kr
Received 2024 September 19; Revised 2024 November 8; Accepted 2025 February 11.

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to develop a clinical pathway (CP) for post-operative care in patients with thyroid cancer in integrative medical center setting, specifically targeting the improvement of quality of life (QoL) and clinical management standardization. The CP was refined through a modified Delphi method and subsequently monitored in a clinical setting.

Methods

The CP model was based on an analysis of medical records of thyroid cancer patients from July 2022 to February 2024. A time-task matrix was established, categorizing tasks by timeline (pre-operative, operation day, post-operative) and clinical activities (KM (Korean Medicine) evaluation, treatment, activity, diet, education). The draft CP model was validated using the modified Delphi method. Finally, the CP was pilot-tested in a clinical environment monitoring indicators such as CP application rate, completion rate, QoL, and satisfaction levels. To evaluate the CP, THYCA-QoL questionnaire was used, and pain levels were assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).

Results

The final CP model showed 81.8% application rate and 100% completion rate during the monitoring period. Results of THYCA-QoL questionnaire showed significant improvement in various aspects, including neuromuscula, oral and throat, and psychological issues. The NRS indicated a 48.1% reduction in neck pain intensity after post-CP application. Both patient and medical staff satisfaction increased following the CP’s application

Conclusions

The integrative CP model for post-operative care in thyroid cancer patients improved QoL and reduced pain, demonstrating its potential as a standardized tool of integrative cancer healthcare settings. Future studies should refine the model and expand its use to validate efficacy and optimize quality of care.

Fig. 1

Development process of clinical pathway of integrative post-operative care in patients with thyroid cancer.

Fig. 2

Treatment algorithm of integrative post-operative care in patients with thyroid cancer

Validity analysis of the CP in integrative medicine for patients treated with thyroidectomy

CP application rate and completion rate

Thyca-QoL questionnaire scores before and after CP application

Table 4

NRS(Neck pain) before and after CP application

The mean and standard deviation of scores in the patient satisfaction survey

The mean and standard deviation of scores in the employee satisfaction survey

References

1. Ahn H., Park Y.. 2009;Incidence and clinical characteristics of thyroid cancer in Korea. Korean Journal of Medicine 77(5):537–542.
2. Haddad RI., Bischoff L., Ball D., et al. 2022;Thyroid carcinoma, version 2.2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 20(8):925–951. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2022.0049.
3. Lee G., Lee E., Kang H., et al. 2016;2016 Revised Korean Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Thyroid Cancer. International Journal of Thyroidology 9(2):59–126.
4. Davies L., Welch HG.. 2006;Increasing incidence of thyroid cancer in the United States, 1973–2002. Jama 295(18):2164–2167. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.18.2164.
5. Li M., Dal Maso L., Vaccarella S.. 2020;Global trends in thyroid cancer incidence and the impact of overdiagnosis. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology 8(6):468–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30115-0.
7. Kim Y., Song D., Lee K., et al. 2012;Comparison of palonosetron with ondansetron in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting after thyroidectomy during a 48-hour period. Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 7(4):312–316.
8. Lee K., Lee G.. 2013;Phenomenology of the Experiences of Women with Thyroidectomy. Korean Oncology Nursing Society 13(3):152–162.
9. Lee J., Shin D., Cho B.. 2014;The current status of cancer survivorship care and a consideration of appropriate care model in Korea. Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology 10(2):58–62. https://doi.org/10.14216/kjco.2014.10.2.58.
10. Lee J., Jeong M., Jung J.. 2008;Tumor Regression Effect of Allergen-removed Rhus Verniciflua Stokes based Traditional Korean Medicine on a Patient with Metastatic Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma : Single Case Report. Journal of Internal Korean Medicine 29(3):827–834.
11. Lee S., Kim K., Yoon J., et al. 2012;Case Report on Three Cases of Postoperative Pain after Thyroidectomy Treated with Gamisoyo-sa. The Society of Pathology in Korean Medicine 26(5):793–796.
12. Go E., Jang K., Yang J., Oh J.. 2021;A Case Report on Papillary Thyroid Cancer Patients after Thyroidectomy Treated with Korean Medicine and Immunotherapy. Journal of Internal Korean Medicine 42(5)
13. Kim D., Lee S., Lee H., Moon B., Yoon J.. 2018;A Case Report of a Thyroid Cancer Patient with Hypoparathyroidism after Total Thyroidectomy by a Combination of Korean-Western Medicine Treatment Including Insamyangyoung-tang. Journal of Internal Korean Medicine 39(4)
14. Every NR., Hochman J., Becker R., Kopecky S., Cannon CP.. 2000;Critical pathways: A review. Circulation 101(4):461–465. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.101.4.461.
15. Lee J.. 2001;Delphi method. Journal of Planning and Policy (299):53–62.
16. Jeong Y., Choi J., Ahn AL., et al. 2015;Validation of the Korean version of the thyroid cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire. Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 89(6):287–293. https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2015.89.6.287.
17. Kang Y., Park J., Gu I.. 2008;Validation of the self-concept and self-acceptance test for people with disabilities. Korea Employment Agency for Persons with Disabilities
18. Noh S.. 2006;Delphi technique: Predict the future with professional insights. Planning and Policy (299):53–62.
19. Lawshe CH.. 1975;A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology 28(4):563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x.
20. Park Y., Lee E., Song Y., et al. 2023;2023 Korean Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Patients with Thyroid Nodules. International Journal of Thyroidology 16(1):1–31.
21. Montazeri A.. 2009;Quality of life data as prognostic indicators of survival in cancer patients: An overview of the literature from 1982 to 2008. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 7:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-7-102.
22. Seo S., Kim H., Lee S., et al. 2022;A Study on the Perception of Concurrent Use of Western and Korean Medicine Care and Integrated Medical Service in Korea - Targeting tertiary hospital users–. Journal of Korean Medicine 43(2):51–60. https://doi.org/10.22246/jikm.2022.43.2.510.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

Development process of clinical pathway of integrative post-operative care in patients with thyroid cancer.

Fig. 2

Treatment algorithm of integrative post-operative care in patients with thyroid cancer

Table 1

Validity analysis of the CP in integrative medicine for patients treated with thyroidectomy

문항 평균±표준편차 중위수 수렴도 합의도 CVR 안정도
문헌 연구와 후향적 차트 리뷰를 바탕으로 갑상선암 수술 후 한의 표준임상경로를 개발하여 의료현장에서 제공하는 것 8.33±0.65 8 1 0.750 1 0.078
진단 및 평가 - 치료계획 - 평가 및 관리]로 이어지는 전체 진료 흐름 8.33±0.78 8.5 0.5 0.882 1 0.093
갑상선암 수술 전 한방처치로 환자의 상태와 선호에 맞춘 대증적 치료로 제시한 것 8.33±0.78 8.5 0.5 0.882 1 0.093
갑상선암 수술 후 나타날 수 있는 부작용을 그룹별로 나누고 그에 따라 치료방법을 제시한 것 8.33±0.65 8 0.5 0.875 1 0.078
갑상선암 수술 전, 후로 나누어 치료 계획을 제시한 것 8.42±0.67 8.5 0.5 0.882 1 0.079
갑상선암 수술 후 한방처치 시점을 POD #5로 제시한 것 8.17±0.94 8.5 1 0.765 1 0.115
협진병원으로서, 양한방 통합치료를 제시한 것 8.58±0.51 9 0.5 0.889 1 0.060
협진병원의 의료환경을 고려하였을 때, 진료흐름 및 내용면에서 적절하게 잘 작성되었다. 8.33±0.78 8.5 0.5 0.882 1 0.093

Table 2

CP application rate and completion rate

적용 완료
적용 건수 (n) 적용률 (%) 완료 건수 (n) 완료율 (%)
18 81.8 18 100

Table 3

Thyca-QoL questionnaire scores before and after CP application

척도 문항 CP 적용 전 점수 (평균±표준편차) CP 적용 후 점수 (평균±표준편차)
다중 항목 척도
신경근육 (다리 쥐남, 행동 느려짐, 관절통, 근육통) 10, 12, 13 5.89±1.41 5.44±1.01
목소리 (쉰 목소리, 약해진 목소리) 3, 4 4.56±1.95 4.17±1.46
주의력 (집중력 장애, 생각이 어려움) 20, 21 3.22±1.44 3.17±0.90
교감신경 (상열감, 열에 민감함) 8, 9 3.00±1.33 3.00±0.94
구강, 인후 (연하곤란, 목 이물감, 구강 건조) 1, 2, 5 7.33±1.80 6.06±1.81
정신심리학적 문제 (불안, 초조함, 심계항진, 갑작스러운 피로 ) 17, 19, 22, 23 7.33±2.49 6.61±1.16
감각 신경계 (안구, 피부) 15, 16 3.72±1.24 3.56±1.17
단일 항목 척도
흉터 6 2.61±0.76 2.33±0.75
오한 7 1.44±0.60 1.33±0.47
손발 저림 11 1.67±0.58 1.39±0.49
체중 증가 14 2.17±0.90 1.78±0.85
두통 18 1.94±0.70 1.50±0.50
성에 흥미 없음 24 1.11±0.31 1.44±0.60

Table 4

NRS(Neck pain) before and after CP application

Table 4

Table 5

The mean and standard deviation of scores in the patient satisfaction survey

Question Mean±SD
의사는 귀하의 건강 상태와 치료 과정에 대해 자세히 설명해 주었습니까? 4.55±0.51
귀하가 수술 후 불편감이 있을 때 이를 빨리 해결해 주었습니까? 4.60±0.50
의료진은 귀하가 묻는 말에 이해하기 쉽게 대답해 주었습니까? 4.55±0.51
간호사는 제공하는 간호에 대해 자세히 설명해 주었습니까? 4.60±0.50
투약 전에 약에 대한 충분한 정보(약의 효능, 부작용)를 받았습니까? 4.10±0.72
퇴원 후 갑상선암 수술 후 관리에 대해 충분한 정보를 받았습니까? 4.25±0.91

Table 6

The mean and standard deviation of scores in the employee satisfaction survey

Question Mean±SD
우리 병원의 갑상선암 수술 후 양한방 통합치료를 위해 입원한 환자 프로세스(입퇴원 수속 과정 포함)에 대하여 전반적으로 만족하십니까? 4.65±0.49
갑상선암 수술 후 양한방 통합치료 대상 환자가 입원하였을 때 귀하께서 환자의 정보(이전 상태, 기저 질환 등)를 얻는 과정은 신속하고 원활합니까? 4.65±0.49
갑상선암 수술 후 양한방 통합치료 대상 환자의 입원부터 퇴원까지의 전체 프로세스에 대해서 모든 의료진이 정확하게 인지하고 있다고 생각하십니까? 4.65±0.49
갑상선암 수술 후 양한방 통합치료 과정 중에 있었던 이벤트 및 환자별 수술 후 주의 사항에 대하여, 담당 의료진 전체가 신속하게 내용을 공유합니까? 4.70±0.47
갑상선암 수술 후 양한방 통합치료 대상 환자의 입원 기간 중 의료직/비의료직 문제가 발생하였을 때, 의료진 간에 정보 공유 및 의사 결정 과정은 신속하고 원활합니까? 4.60±0.50
갑상선암 수술 후 양한방 통합치료 대상 환자의 입원부터 퇴원까지 전 과정에 있어, 각 직종이 해야할 역할이 중복이나 누락, 모호함이 없이 명확하게 분담되어 있습니까? 4.50±0.61
갑상선암 수술 후 양한방 통합치료 대상 환자 및 가족들에게 입원부터 퇴원까지의 전체 과정에 대한 정보가 충분히 제공되고 있습니까? 4.75±0.44