Perspectives on the Use of Traditional Korean Medicine in Severe Trauma Patients: a Qualitative Study

Article information

J Korean Med. 2025;46(2):93-107
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 June 1
doi : https://doi.org/10.13048/jkm.25021
1,2School of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University
3,4,5College of Korean Medicine, Dongshin University
Correspondence to: Dongsu Kim College of Oriental Medicine, Dongshin University, 120-9 Dongshindae-gil, Naju city, Jeollanam-do, South Korea, 58245, Tel: +82-61-330-3528, E-mail: dskim20@dsu.ac.kr
§

These authors contributed equally to this work.

Received 2025 April 14; Revised 2025 May 15; Accepted 2025 May 22.

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to explore the use of Korean Medicine (KM) for severe trauma, investigating its clinical application, challenges faced by patients and practitioners, and potential improvements.

Methods

Between December 2023 and September 2024, in-depth interviews were conducted with three trauma patients and five KM practitioners. The interviews were analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis.

Results

Trauma patients reported being rarely informed about KM by their Western medicine doctors during hospitalization. Many viewed KM as an additional financial burden, while considering Western treatments essential. Patients also faced challenges such as pain management side effects, prognosis uncertainty, isolation, and quality-of-life issues, suggesting KM’s potential to address these. KM practitioners typically treated severe trauma cases after referrals, often post-acute phase. They highlighted KM’s potential in pain relief, mitigating painkiller side effects, and improving chronic patients’ quality of life. However, KM treatments were underutilized due to reluctance from Western medicine doctors, lack of patient knowledge, insurance constraints, and treatment frequency limitations. Practitioners emphasized the need for proving KM’s safety and efficacy, developing clinical guidelines, improving coordination between KM clinics and hospitals, fostering hospital interactions, and securing policy and financial support.

Conclusions

This study identified challenges in KM trauma care and proposed solutions, offering insights to improve trauma care and enhance patient quality of life. The findings provide valuable data for the KM sector and health authorities.

Fig. 1

The Improvement Measures for Promoting KM Treatment for Severe Trauma Proposed by the Interview Participants (D1~D5)

Characteristics of Participants 1: Korean Medicine Doctors (As of 2024)

Characteristics of Participants 2: Severe Trauma Patients (As of 2024)

References

1. Jo J. Y., Park S. J., Ahn J. Y., Kwon S. H.. 2020;Current status of community-based severe trauma. Public Health Weekly Report
2. 2023 Community-Based Severe Trauma Survey Statistics 2025. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
3. Statistics Korea. 2024. 2023 Causes of Death Statistics Results. Press Release, Population Trends Division, Social Statistics Bureau file:///C:/Users/jieun/Downloads/2023%EB%85%84%20%EC%82%AC%EB%A7%9D%EC%9B%90%EC%9D%B8%ED%86%B5%EA%B3%84%20%EA%B2%B0%EA%B3%BC.pdf.
4. Ha J. W., Han K. T., Kim D. G., et al. 2017. A study on the burden of medical expenses for patients with severe trauma: changes in medical care use patterns and income National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital Research Institute.
5. Nguyen H. B., Rivers E. P., Havastad S.. 2000;Critical care in the emergency department: A physiologic assessment and outcome evaluation. Academic Emergency Medicine 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb00492.x.
6. Kim M. S., Kim H. J.. 2024;Analysis of Nursing Interventions for Severe Occupational Accident Trauma Patients Based on Major Injury Site. Korean Journal of Occupational Health Nursing 10.5807/kjohn.2024.33.4.173.
7. Kim T. Y., Jung K. W., Kwon J. S., Kim J. Y., Baek S. J., Song S. Y., et al. 2011;Experience with the Treatment of Patients with Major Trauma at the Department of Trauma Surgery in One Regional Emergency Medical Center for One Year. Journal of Trauma and Injury
8. Kim S. N., Mortera M., Wen P. S., Thompson K. L., Lundgren K., Reed W. R., et al. 2023;The Impact of Complementary and Integrative Medicine Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000778.
9. Wahbeh H., Senders A., Neuendorf R., Cayton J.. 2018;Complementary and Alternative Medicine for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms: A Systematic Review. FOCUS 10.1177/2156587214525403.
10. Liu C. T., Hsieh T. M., Wu B. Y., Huang Y. C., Shih C. H., Hu W. L., et al. 2022;Acupuncture Analgesia in Patients with Traumatic Rib Fractures: A Randomized-Controlled Trial. Front. Med 10.3389/fmed.2022.896692.
11. Papadopoulos G., Tzimas P., Liarmakopoulou A., Petrou A.. 2017;Auricular Acupuncture Analgesia in Thoracic Trauma: A Case Report. Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies 10.1016/j.jams.2016.06.003.
12. Donnellan C.. 2006;Acupuncture for Central Pain Affecting the Ribcage following Traumatic Brain Injury and Rib Fractures – a Case Report. Acupuncture in Medicine 10.1136/aim.24.3.129.
13. Taguette. Feeding Your Qualitative Needs [citied 2025 Mar. 10]. Available from https://www.taguette.org.
14. Braun V., Clarke V.. 2006;Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2):77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
15. Braun V., Clarke V.. Thematic Analysis. In : Cooper H., ed. 2012. The Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology p. 57–71. Washington DC: American Psychological Association. p. 57–71.
16. Tong A., Sainsbury P., Craig J.. 2007;Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ): a 32-item Checklist for Interviews and Focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 19(6):349–57. 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
17. Kim M. H., Kim M. H., Park J. H.. 2013;Characteristics and Nursing Activities of Severe Trauma Patients Regarding the Main Damaged Body Parts. Bionusing 10.7586/jkbns.2013.15.4.210.
18. Chae S. I.. 2003. Social science search methodology Seoul: Hackyeonsa Publishing Co.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

The Improvement Measures for Promoting KM Treatment for Severe Trauma Proposed by the Interview Participants (D1~D5)

Table 1

Characteristics of Participants 1: Korean Medicine Doctors (As of 2024)

Participants Gender Age Total Clinical Career (years) Severe Trauma Treatment Experience (years) Hospital Type Specialist Status
D1 Male 40’s 15+ 5–10 Acute care KM specialist
D2 Female 40’s 15+ 5–10 Acute care KM specialist
D3 Female 40’s 15+ 10–15 Rehabilitation KM specialist
D4 Male 50’s 15+ 10–15 Rehabilitation KM specialist
D5 Female 40’s 10+ 10–15 Rehabilitation KM specialist

Table 2

Characteristics of Participants 2: Severe Trauma Patients (As of 2024)

Participants Gender Age Injured Area Duration of Hospitalization Recipt of KM Treatment during Severe Trauma Prior Experience of KM Treatement
P1 Male 20’s Polytrauma Including Lung and Ribs 12 Weeks Yes Yes
P2 Male 50’s Polytrauma Including Ribs and Shoulder 6 Months No Yes
P3 Female 20’s Pelvis, Ribs, Lungs and Spleen 4 Weeks No Yes